I attended the conference as a co-presenter for a workshop titled: ‘Creating Leadership Capacity for Long-term Change’. The session explored how community capacity includes the collective ability of residents, leaders and organizations to define, pursue and achieve their goals. My co-presenter, Genoveva Islas, and I planned a fun and engaging session during which we shared brief vignettes about our community engagement work and how community transformation happens at the grassroots level. It was fabulous.
But only a few – very few – attended. I was curious about this.
Our session was in parallel to five others that sounded a whole lot more related to the ‘health care industry’. So, if the majority of the symposium participants were, in fact, from the health care sector, which certainly seemed to be the case, it made sense to me that they would attend sessions like, ‘Using Participatory Research and Evaluation’ or ‘Using Strategic Communications to Change How Health is Understood, Practiced, and Experienced’. In retrospect, then, I am not sure that we – the non ‘health care’ participants – were necessary to the goals of the meeting.
Nevertheless, our presence made for interesting conversation. “Nooooo… I am not a community health worker. I work with neighborhood leaders who are organizing their community around a culture of health.” The difference was not clear to many.
The symposium’s title was, ‘Community Agency & Health’ and I arrived not knowing what ‘agency’ meant in this context. It wasn’t until early during the second day that it finally clicked. To quote the webpage through which the tickets were sold:
Dina Newman raising an issue during the symposium
We non ‘health care’ folks have been doing this in our communities for years. “Nothing about us, without us!” has been the rally cry of our residents. We have listened and we have learned from the wisdom in the room, and often times the real ‘expert’ is the one we are trying to help. So, for me, what was most encouraging and enlightening at the symposium were the stories of the communities rising to meet their challenges – the case examples of the Bronx Healthy Buildings Program and the Building Healthy Communities, South Kern. With those, I raised my hand in solidarity and nodded my head in agreement, as they told their how-we-got-over stories of success.
When I reflect back on the symposium, I also remember Carl Baty. I remember the vulnerability of this man, who, with the rawest of emotions, shared his testimony of survival and resilience through addiction. I remember the stuttered silence amongst the crowd who, at first, giggled nervously, and then quickly realized that this moment was not scripted, but, indeed, was a purging of the soul for the sake of transparency and knowledge – and we had better learn something. I will forever remember Carl.
By the time the symposium came to a close I had an abundance of great handouts, a renewed sense to keep on doing what we were doing, and contact information from a few people who wanted to learn more about my work and I wanted to know more about their work.
We agreed we would stay in touch. But, we haven’t.
I’m not sure why.
1 thought on “Community Health. Healthy Community. Semantics?”
Would love to get involved.